Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893374›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The complete chloroplast genome sequences of four Viola species (Violaceae) and comparative analyses with its congeneric species.

Kyeong-Sik Cheon, Kyung-Ah Kim, Myounghai Kwak, Byoungyoon Lee, Ki-Oug Yoo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plastomes ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Complete chloroplast genome sequences ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyeong-Sik CheonDepartment of Biological Science, Sangji University, Wonju, Gangwon, South Korea.
Kyung-Ah KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, South Korea.
Myounghai KwakPlant Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, South Korea.
Byoungyoon LeePlant Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, South Korea.
Ki-Oug YooDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-6878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the complete chloroplast genomes of four Viola species (V. mirabilis, V. phalacrocarpa, V. raddeana, and V. websteri) and the results of a comparative analysis between these species and the published plastid genome of the congeneric species V. seoulensis. The total genome length of the five Viola species, including the four species analyzed in this study and the species analyzed in the previous study, ranged from 156,507 (V. seoulensis) to 158,162 bp (V. mirabilis). The overall GC contents of the genomes were almost identical (36.2-36.3%). The five Viola plastomes each contained 111 unique genes comprising 77 protein-coding genes, 30 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and 4 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. Among the annotated genes, 16 contained one or two introns. Based on the results of a chloroplast genome structure comparison using MAUVE, all five Viola plastomes were almost identical. Additionally, the large single copy (LSC), inverted repeat (IR), and small single copy (SSC) junction regions were conserved among the Viola species. A total of 259 exon, intron, and intergenic spacer (IGS) fragments were compared to verify the divergence hotspot regions. The nucleotide diversity (Pi) values ranged from 0 to 0.7544. The IR region was relatively more conserved than the LSC and SSC regions. The Pi values in ten noncoding regions were relatively high (>0.03). Among these regions, all but rps19-trnH, petG-trnW, rpl16-rps3, and rpl2-rpl23 represent useful molecular markers for phylogenetic studies and will be helpful to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of Viola. The phylogenetic tree, which used 76 protein-coding genes from 21 Malpighiales species and one outgroup species (Averrhoa carambola), revealed that Malpighiales is divided into five clades at the family level: Erythroxylaceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Salicaceae, and Violaceae. Additionally, Violaceae was monophyletic, with a bootstrap value of 100% and was divided into two subclades.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastPhylogenyChloroplast ProteinsRNA, ChloroplastSpecies SpecificityViolaChloroplast ProteinsRNA, Chloroplast

Identifiers

PMID30893374
PMCPMC6426196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.