Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Study on the inflammatory response of PMMA/polystyrene/silica nanocomposite membranes for drug delivery and dental applications.

S Shanmugasundar, N Kannan, E Sundaravadivel, Sarang Zsolt, K S Mukunthan, J Manokaran, J Narendranath, V P Kamalakannan, P Kavitha, V Prabhu and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S ShanmugasundarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
N KannanDepartment of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
E SundaravadivelSRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sarang ZsoltDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
K S MukunthanDepartment of Biotechnology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
J ManokaranDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
J NarendranathDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
V P KamalakannanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
P KavithaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
V PrabhuDepartment of Chemistry, College of Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.
N BalasubramanianDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0763-8595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of polymeric materials in medical industry has grown drastically in the last two decades due to their various advantages compared to existing materials. The present research work emphases on the sol-gel technique to formulate the polymethyl methyl acrylate/polystyrene/silica composite membrane.

methodsThe characteristic of the composite was investigated through modern state art of instrumentation.

resultsThe functional groups attached to the polymer was absorbed by FTIR. The FTIR spectrum confirm that the blend was mixed thoroughly and the formation of unite intimately between the polymers. The membranes were observed by SEM for its surface homogeneity which depends upon the composition of the two blending polymers. The captured SEM images showed the formation of microcracks on the surface, which was evidently controlled by varying the constituent polymer ratios. The prepared blend membranes with 2:1 ratio of PMMA/PS/Si displayed higher water uptake compared to other blended membranes. The composite membranes had good hydroxyl apatite growth in SBF solution. Furthermore, the in vitro cytotoxicity studies carried out by MTT method, using RAW macrophage cells showed that all the samples exhibited excellent cell viability.

conclusionThe inflammatory response of composite with equal concentration of PMMA-PS were performed and observed no inflammation in comparison with control and other tested concentrations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone CementsCell SurvivalDrug Delivery SystemsMaterials TestingMembranes, ArtificialMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanocompositesPolymethyl MethacrylatePolystyrenesRAW 264.7 CellsSilicon DioxideSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSurface PropertiesBone CementsMembranes, ArtificialPolymethyl MethacrylatePolystyrenesSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID30893342
PMCPMC6426241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.