Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30893316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Mitogenomes illuminate the origin and migration patterns of the indigenous people of the Canary Islands.

Rosa Fregel, Alejandra C Ordóñez, Jonathan Santana-Cabrera, Vicente M Cabrera, Javier Velasco-Vázquez, Verónica Alberto, Marco A Moreno-Benítez, Teresa Delgado-Darias, Amelia Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Juan C Hernández and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The chronology of the human colonization of the Canary Islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosa FregelDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2951-6508
Alejandra C OrdóñezDepartment of Prehistory, Anthropology and Ancient History, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3568-3246
Jonathan Santana-CabreraDepartment of Archaeology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-8560
Vicente M CabreraDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Cell Biology and Genetics, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Javier Velasco-VázquezDepartment of Historical Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Verónica AlbertoTibicena Arqueología y Patrimonio, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Marco A Moreno-BenítezTibicena Arqueología y Patrimonio, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Teresa Delgado-DariasMuseo Canario, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Amelia Rodríguez-RodríguezDepartment of Historical Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7112-2441
Juan C HernándezMuseo Arqueológico de La Gomera, San Sebastián de La Gomera, Spain.
Jorge PaisMuseo Arqueológico Benahoarita, Los Llanos de Aridane, Spain.
Rafaela González-MontelongoGenomics Division, Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables, Granadilla, Spain.
José M Lorenzo-SalazarGenomics Division, Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables, Granadilla, Spain.
Carlos FloresGenomics Division, Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables, Granadilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-069X
M Carmen Cruz-de-MercadalMuseo Canario, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Nuria Álvarez-RodríguezMuseo Arqueológico de La Gomera, San Sebastián de La Gomera, Spain.
Beth ShapiroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Matilde ArnayDepartment of Prehistory, Anthropology and Ancient History, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Carlos D BustamanteDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Universidad de La Laguna · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESNational Archaeological Museum of Spain · ESInstituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables · ESPatrimonio Nacional · ESDurham University · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Canary Islands' indigenous people have been the subject of substantial archaeological, anthropological, linguistic and genetic research pointing to a most probable North African Berber source. However, neither agreement about the exact point of origin nor a model for the indigenous colonization of the islands has been established. To shed light on these questions, we analyzed 48 ancient mitogenomes from 25 archaeological sites from the seven main islands. Most lineages observed in the ancient samples have a Mediterranean distribution, and belong to lineages associated with the Neolithic expansion in the Near East and Europe (T2c, J2a, X3a…). This phylogeographic analysis of Canarian ancient mitogenomes, the first of its kind, shows that some lineages are restricted to Central North Africa (H1cf, J2a2d and T2c1d3), while others have a wider distribution, including both West and Central North Africa, and, in some cases, Europe and the Near East (U6a1a1, U6a7a1, U6b, X3a, U6c1). In addition, we identify four new Canarian-specific lineages (H1e1a9, H4a1e, J2a2d1a and L3b1a12) whose coalescence dates correlate with the estimated time for the colonization of the islands (1st millennia CE). Additionally, we observe an asymmetrical distribution of mtDNA haplogroups in the ancient population, with certain haplogroups appearing more frequently in the islands closer to the continent. This reinforces results based on modern mtDNA and Y-chromosome data, and archaeological evidence suggesting the existence of two distinct migrations. Comparisons between insular populations show that some populations had high genetic diversity, while others were probably affected by genetic drift and/or bottlenecks. In spite of observing interinsular differences in the survival of indigenous lineages, modern populations, with the sole exception of La Gomera, are homogenous across the islands, supporting the theory of extensive human mobility after the European conquest.

Indexed as

Africa, NorthernEthnicityEuropeGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationGenome, MitochondrialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle EastMitochondriaPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNASpainTransients and Migrants

Identifiers

PMID30893316
PMCPMC6426200
OpenAlexW2950019155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.