Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30892969›Full record

ArticleExpert review of vaccines2019

Designing tuberculosis vaccine efficacy trials - lessons from recent studies.

Ann M Ginsberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [New vaccines against tuberculosis].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann M Ginsberga Clinical Development , International AIDS Vaccine Initiative , New York , NY , USA.
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious killer globally and new TB vaccines will be crucial to ending the epidemic. Since the introduction in 1921 of the only currently licensed TB vaccine, BCG, very few novel vaccine candidates or strategies have advanced into clinical efficacy trials. Areas covered: Recently, however, two TB vaccine efficacy trials with novel designs have reported positive results and are now driving new momentum in the field. They are the first Prevention of Infection trial, evaluating the H4:IC31 candidate or BCG revaccination in high-risk adolescents and a Prevention of Disease trial evaluating the M72/AS01

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesTuberculosis VaccinesBCG revaccinationcorrelate of protectionefficacy trialH4:IC31®incipient TBM72/AS01prevention of disease (POD)prevention of infection (POI)prevention of recurrence (POR)tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID30892969
PMCPMC6492041
OpenAlexW2922703723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.