ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Feasibility of absolute quantification for
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absolute Quantification of Brain Deuterium Metabolic Imaging in Healthy Volunteers and Glioblastoma Patients at 7T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a Double TunedNMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Advances in application of novel magnetic resonance imaging technologies in liver disease diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Increased cardiac Pi/PCr in the diabetic heart observed using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 7T.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cardio-Oncology: Understanding the Intersections Between Cardiac Metabolism and Cancer Biology.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2021Review
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Injuries Assessment during Pancreas Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Utilizing Dynamic Phosphorous-31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Early Detection of Acute Compartment Syndrome: A Pilot Study on Rats.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Feasibility of absolute quantification forMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposePhosphorus spectroscopy can differentiate among liver disease stages and types. To quantify absolute concentrations of phosphorus metabolites, sensitivity calibration and transmit field (
methodsThe effect of phantom conductivity was assessed at 25.8 MHz (1.5 T), 49.9 MHz (3 T), and 120.3 MHz (7 T) by electromagnetic modeling. Radiofrequency field maps (
resultsSimulations show that quantification errors of less than 3% are achievable using a uniform electrolyte phantom with a conductivity of 0.23-0.86 S.m
conclusionIt is essential to select a calibration phantom with appropriate conductivity for quantitative phosphorus spectroscopy at 7 T. Using an 18-mM phosphate phantom and simplified normalization, human liver phosphate metabolite concentrations were successfully quantified at 7 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.