Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30892394›Full record

ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2019

Evaluation tool for a gastroenterostomy simulated training1.

Márcio Alencar Barreira, Delano Gurgel Siveira, Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha, Luiz Gonzaga de Moura Junior, Charles Jean Gomes de Mesquita, Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira Borges

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Márcio Alencar BarreiraMD, Surgical Oncologist, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Conception and design of the study; technical procedures; acquisition, interpretation and analysis of data; manuscript preparation and writing.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-8732
Delano Gurgel SiveiraMD, General Surgeon, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, UFC, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Technical procedures, critical revision.
Hermano Alexandre Lima RochaPhD, Assistant Professor, Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health, Centro Universitário Christus (UNICHRISTUS), Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, critical revision.
Luiz Gonzaga de Moura JuniorPhD, Hospital Geral Dr. César Cals, Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health, UNICHRISTUS, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, critical revision.
Charles Jean Gomes de MesquitaPhD, Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health, UNICHRISTUS, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, interpretation and analysis of data, critical revision, final approval.
Gleydson Cesar de Oliveira BorgesMD, Holy House of Mercy of Fortaleza, Professional Master's Degree Program in Minimally Invasive Technology and Simulation in Health, UNICHRISTUS, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Conception and design of the study, interpretation and analysis of data, critical revision, final approval.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create a checklist to evaluate the performance and systematize the gastroenterostomy simulated training.

methodsExperimental longitudinal study of a quantitative character. The sample consisted of twelve general surgery residents. The training was divided into 5 sessions and consisted of participation in 20 gastroenterostomys in synthetic organs. The training was accompanied by an experienced surgeon who was responsible for the feedback and the anastomoses evaluation. The anastomoses evaluated were the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and tenth. A 10 item checklist and the time to evaluate performance were used.

resultsResidents showed a reduction in operative time and evolution in the surgical technique statistically significant (p<0.01). The correlation index of 0.545 and 0,295 showed a high linear correlation between time variables and Checklist. The average Checklist score went from 6.8 to 9 points.

conclusionThe proposed checklist can be used to evaluate the performance and systematization of a simulated training aimed at configuring a gastroenterostomy.

Indexed as

ChecklistInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceGastroenterostomyHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, AnatomicSimulation Training

Identifiers

PMID30892394
PMCPMC6585891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.