Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30892380›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2019

Resolubility of eye care in a secondary care center: a quantitative approach.

Inês Paula Regina Mainini Oliveira, Silmara Meneguin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inês Paula Regina Mainini OliveiraUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-4261
Silmara MeneguinUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-5134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the resolubility of ophthalmologic care in an integrated health center.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study including 816 patients who were attended from November 2013 to November of 2015. Data were collected from a medical consultation database and patients' medical records.

resultsThe majority of participants were women, non-diabetic, and had high school education. The main cause of referral for ophthalmologic evaluation was the consultation with a specialist, the waiting time for consultation was shorter for non-diabetic patients.

conclusionThis Integrated health center presented, partial resolubility conditions to meet the ophthalmologic needs of users of the Brazilian Unified Health System. Eye care needs to be reorganized particularly by consider the priority cases of those at ophthalmological risk, and referrals should be done to the adequate care level and on time to guarantee resolubility.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedNational Health Programs

Identifiers

PMID30892380
PMCPMC6422360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.