Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891838›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Comparing MRI metrics to quantify white matter microstructural damage in multiple sclerosis.

Ilona Lipp, Derek K Jones, Sonya Bells, Eleonora Sgarlata, Catherine Foster, Rachael Stickland, Alison E Davidson, Emma C Tallantyre, Neil P Robertson, Richard G Wise and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Ilona LippDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-2057
Derek K JonesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Sonya BellsCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Eleonora SgarlataDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Catherine FosterCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Rachael SticklandCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Alison E DavidsonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Emma C TallantyreDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Neil P RobertsonDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Richard G WiseCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff, UK.
Valentina TomassiniDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBHospital for Sick Children · CAMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1Multiple Sclerosis SocietyWellcome TrustWellcome Trust Investigator Award 096646/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust Strategic Award 104943/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying white matter damage in vivo is becoming increasingly important for investigating the effects of neuroprotective and repair strategies in multiple sclerosis (MS). While various approaches are available, the relationship between MRI-based metrics of white matter microstructure in the disease, that is, to what extent the metrics provide complementary versus redundant information, remains largely unexplored. We obtained four microstructural metrics from 123 MS patients: fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), myelin water fraction (MWF), and magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR). Coregistration of maps of these four indices allowed quantification of microstructural damage through voxel-wise damage scores relative to healthy tissue, as assessed in a group of 27 controls. We considered three white matter tissue-states, which were expected to vary in microstructural damage: normal appearing white matter (NAWM), T2-weighted hyperintense lesional tissue without T1-weighted hypointensity (T2L), and T1-weighted hypointense lesional tissue with corresponding T2-weighted hyperintensity (T1L). All MRI indices suggested significant damage in all three tissue-states, the greatest damage being in T1L. The correlations between indices ranged from r = 0.18 to r = 0.87. MWF was most sensitive when differentiating T2L from NAWM, while MTR was most sensitive when differentiating T1L from NAWM and from T2L. Combining the four metrics into one, through a principal component analysis, did not yield a measure more sensitive to damage than any single measure. Our findings suggest that the metrics are (at least partially) correlated with each other, but sensitive to the different aspects of pathology. Leveraging these differences could be beneficial in clinical trials testing the effects of therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisNeuroimagingWhite MatterAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle Agedbrain MRIdiffusionlesionsmagnetisation transfer ratiomultiple sclerosismyelin water fraction

Identifiers

PMID30891838
PMCPMC6563497
OpenAlexW2922738241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.