Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891797›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Composite interaction tree for simultaneous learning of optimal individualized treatment rules and subgroups.

Xin Qiu, Yuanjia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin QiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Yuanjia WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-3315

Funding

Statistical Methods for Integrating Mixed-type Biomarkers and Phenotypes in Neurodegenerative Disease ModelingR01NS073671 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2011 to 2025
$3.9M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Integrative Learning to Combine Evidence for Personalized Treatment Strategies.R21MH117458 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2018 to 2019
$446k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM124104NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIMH NIH HHS MH117458NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH117458NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment response heterogeneity has long been observed in patients affected by chronic diseases. Administering an individualized treatment rule (ITR) offers an opportunity to tailor treatment strategies according to patient-specific characteristics. Overly complex machine learning methods for estimating ITRs may produce treatment rules that have higher benefit but lack transparency and interpretability. In clinical practices, it is desirable to derive a simple and interpretable ITR while maintaining certain optimality that leads to improved benefit in subgroups of patients, if not on the overall sample. In this work, we propose a tree-based robust learning method to estimate optimal piecewise linear ITRs and identify subgroups of patients with a large benefit. We achieve these goals by simultaneously identifying qualitative and quantitative interactions through a tree model, referred to as the composite interaction tree (CITree). We show that it has improved performance compared to existing methods on both overall sample and subgroups via extensive simulation studies. Lastly, we fit CITree to Research Evaluating the Value of Augmenting Medication with Psychotherapy trial for treating patients with major depressive disorders, where we identified both qualitative and quantitative interactions and subgroups of patients with a large benefit.

Indexed as

LearningPrecision MedicineFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychotherapyQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicmental disorderspersonalized medicinequalitative interactionquantitative interactiontree-based method

Identifiers

PMID30891797
PMCPMC8548070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.