ArticleMedical physics2019
Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of machine learning for radiation pneumonitis and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Generative and Graph-Based Representation Learning for Multiomics Survival Stratification in Ovarian Cancer: Secondary Analysis.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Deep learning combining imaging, dose and clinical data for predicting bowel toxicity after pelvic radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches to predict the need for intensive care unit admission among Iranian COVID-19 patients based on ICD-10: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Fostering Transformation: Unleashing the Power of Artifical Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Field of Radiation Oncology.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- SH3GL2 and MMP17 as lung adenocarcinoma biomarkers: a machine-learning based approach.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Improved outcome models with denoising diffusion.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in precision oncology: a review on enhancing discoverability through multiomics integration.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- The predictive value of pretherapy [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- A deep learning approach for morphological feature extraction based on variational auto-encoder: an application to mandible shape.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Benchmarking machine learning approaches to predict radiation-induced toxicities in lung cancer patients.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality in hypertensive patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Assessing retinal vein occlusion based on color fundus photographs using neural understanding network (NUN).Medical physics · 2023Article
- AI/ML advances in non-small cell lung cancer biomarker discovery.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Towards a safe and efficient clinical implementation of machine learning in radiation oncology by exploring model interpretability, explainability and data-model dependency.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Integrating Multiomics Information in Deep Learning Architectures for Joint Actuarial Outcome Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Article
- A Cascaded Neural Network for Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Pre-Treatment CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere has been burgeoning interest in applying machine learning methods for predicting radiotherapy outcomes. However, the imbalanced ratio of a large number of variables to a limited sample size in radiation oncology constitutes a major challenge. Therefore, dimensionality reduction methods can be a key to success. The study investigates and contrasts the application of traditional machine learning methods and deep learning approaches for outcome modeling in radiotherapy. In particular, new joint architectures based on variational autoencoder (VAE) for dimensionality reduction are presented and their application is demonstrated for the prediction of lung radiation pneumonitis (RP) from a large-scale heterogeneous dataset.
methodsA large-scale heterogeneous dataset containing a pool of 230 variables including clinical factors (e.g., dose, KPS, stage) and biomarkers (e.g., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), cytokines, and micro-RNAs) in a population of 106 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received radiotherapy was used for modeling RP. Twenty-two patients had grade 2 or higher RP. Four methods were investigated, including feature selection (case A) and feature extraction (case B) with traditional machine learning methods, a VAE-MLP joint architecture (case C) with deep learning and lastly, the combination of feature selection and joint architecture (case D). For feature selection, Random forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were implemented to select relevant features. Specifically, each method was run for multiple times to rank features within several cross-validated (CV) resampled sets. A collection of ranking lists were then aggregated by top 5% and Kemeny graph methods to identify the final ranking for prediction. A synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to correct for class imbalance during this process. For deep learning, a VAE-MLP joint architecture where a VAE aimed for dimensionality reduction and an MLP aimed for classification was developed. In this architecture, reconstruction loss and prediction loss were combined into a single loss function to realize simultaneous training and weights were assigned to different classes to mitigate class imbalance. To evaluate the prediction performance and conduct comparisons, the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were performed for nested CVs for both handcrafted feature selections and the deep learning approach. The significance of differences in AUCs was assessed using the DeLong test of U-statistics.
resultsAn MLP-based method using weight pruning (WP) feature selection yielded the best performance among the different hand-crafted feature selection methods (case A), reaching an AUC of 0.804 (95% CI: 0.761-0.823) with 29 top features. A VAE-MLP joint architecture (case C) achieved a comparable but slightly lower AUC of 0.781 (95% CI: 0.737-0.808) with the size of latent dimension being 2. The combination of handcrafted features (case A) and latent representation (case D) achieved a significant AUC improvement of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.805-0.863) with 22 features (P-value = 0.000642 compared with handcrafted features only (Case A) and P-value = 0.000453 compared to VAE alone (Case C)) with an MLP classifier.
conclusionThe potential for combination of traditional machine learning methods and deep learning VAE techniques has been demonstrated for dealing with limited datasets in modeling radiotherapy toxicities. Specifically, latent variables from a VAE-MLP joint architecture are able to complement handcrafted features for the prediction of RP and improve prediction over either method alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.