Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891712›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2019

Implementing a concept network model.

Sarah H Solomon, John D Medaglia, Sharon L Thompson-Schill

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05746299 (The Emergence of Abstract Structure Knowledge Across Learning and Sleep), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05746299 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Emergence of Abstract Structure Knowledge Across Learning and Sleep

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled194ConditionsMemory ConsolidationArmsCongruent vs. Incongruent, Immediate vs. Awake vs. Asleep, Targeted memory reactivation (TMR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing the human learnability of abstract network representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah H SolomonDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sarahsol@sas.upenn.edu.
John D MedagliaDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sharon L Thompson-SchillDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Conceptual CombinationR01DC015359 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Dynamic Network Neuroscience and Control Theory: Toward Interventions for Cognitive Control DysfunctionDP5OD021352 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEDAGLIA, JOHN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015359NIH HHS DP5 OD021352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The same concept can mean different things or be instantiated in different forms, depending on context, suggesting a degree of flexibility within the conceptual system. We propose that a feature-based network model can be used to capture and predict this flexibility. We modeled individual concepts (e.g., BANANA, BOTTLE) as graph-theoretical networks, in which properties (e.g., YELLOW, SWEET) were represented as nodes and their associations as edges. In this framework, networks capture within-concept statistics that reflect how properties relate to one another across instances of a concept. We extracted formal measures of these networks that capture different aspects of network structure, and explored whether a concept's network structure relates to its flexibility of use. To do so, we compared network measures to a text-based measure of semantic diversity, as well as to empirical data from a figurative-language task and an alternative-uses task. We found that network-based measures were predictive of the text-based and empirical measures of flexible concept use, highlighting the ability of this approach to formally capture relevant characteristics of conceptual structure. Conceptual flexibility is a fundamental attribute of the cognitive and semantic systems, and in this proof of concept we reveal that variations in concept representation and use can be formally understood in terms of the informational content and topology of concept networks.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalComprehensionConcept FormationSemanticsConceptual flexibilityConceptual knowledgeNetwork science

Identifiers

PMID30891712
PMCPMC6692248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.