ArticleMycopathologia2019
Genotypic and Phenotypic Analyses of Two "Isogenic" Strains of the Human Fungal Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncovering the role of mitochondrial genome in pathogenicity and drug resistance in pathogenic fungi.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Phenotypic Plasticity in the Productions of Virulence Factors Within and Among Serotypes in the Cryptococcus neoformans Species Complex.Mycopathologia · 2022Article
- Factors enforcing the species boundary between the human pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus deneoformans.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- On the History and Applications of Congenic Strains inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Multi-locus Sequence Typing and Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of Cryptococcus neoformans Isolated from Clinical Specimens in Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.Mycopathologia · 2020Article
- Mitochondrial Genome Polymorphisms in the Human Pathogenic FungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Genetic Changes in Experimental Populations of a Hybrid in thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- MycopathologiaGENOMES: The New 'Home' for the Publication of Fungal Genomes.Mycopathologia · 2019Article
- Contemporary Gene Flow is a Major Force Shaping the Aspergillus fumigatus Population in Auckland, New Zealand.Mycopathologia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Cryptococcus neoformans species complex is a model organism for fungal studies. Many studies have used two strains, JEC20 and JEC21, and their derivatives. These two strains were obtained through 10 rounds of backcrosses and have been assumed near identical except at the mating-type locus. Here we obtained and compared the JEC20 genome sequence with the published "JEC21" genome. Our comparison revealed 5322 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the majority (N = 3816, 71.7%) located in three genomic regions, including the previously noted mating-type region. The remaining 1506 SNPs (28.3%) were distributed throughout all 14 chromosomes, predominantly at chromosomal ends. To study the potential effects of these three SNP-rich regions on phenotypes, 24 progenies from the JEC20 × JEC21 cross representing eight recombinant genotypes were analyzed for their mating ability, melanin production, capsule formation, and growths at 30 °C and 40 °C. Significant phenotypic variations were found among the progeny. However, the observed phenotypic variations could not be explained by the three SNP-rich regions. Further genome sequencing of our JEC21 and the 24 progenies revealed only six segregating SNPs outside of the three SNP-rich regions between JEC20 and JEC21, a result indicating that the 1500 SNPs identified in the published "JEC21" genome might be caused by sequencing errors and/or strain mixing. However, the six SNPs and the three SNP-rich regions could not explain the observed phenotypic variations. Our analyses suggest that spontaneous mutations accumulated under laboratory conditions could have significant effects on phenotypes and on our interpretations of experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.