Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891626›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Assessing patients' experiences of cancer care across the treatment pathway: a mapping review of recent psychosocial cancer care publications.

Rob Sanson-Fisher, Kristy Fakes, Amy Waller, Lisa Mackenzie, Jamie Bryant, Anne Herrmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rob Sanson-FisherHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. rob.sanson-fisher@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-2949
Kristy FakesHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Amy WallerHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Lisa MackenzieHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Jamie BryantHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Anne HerrmannHealth Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF HUMAN LEUKEMIAS AND LYMPHOMASK08CA001102 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MEEKER, TIMOTHY C. · 1986 to 1991
–
Cancer Council NSW (AU) PG16-09Cancer Institute NSW Strategic Research Partnership Grant (CSR 11-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients are a critical source of information about the quality of the components of cancer care that contributes to optimal psychosocial outcomes. Recently published research was examined to determine the: (1) proportion of studies that examined at least one of 14 components of cancer care, (2) the proportion of studies that included multiple components of care, and (3) the phase of the cancer care pathway in which data collection occurred (i.e. pre-, during and post-treatment).

methodsMEDLINE was searched to retrieve all data-based publications indexed for two international psychosocial cancer care journals (Supportive Care in Cancer and Psycho-Oncology) over a 2-year period. A total of 333 publications yielded 214 eligible publications that were assessed against the 14 components of care for which measurement by healthcare providers at multiple phases during cancer care is recommended. Publications were coded based on the: (1) specific component/s of care focused upon in the research, (2) number of components examined and (3) timing of data collection.

resultsThe most frequently assessed component of care was physical and psychosocial screening (n = 198, 93%). Most studies (n = 187, 87%) examined a single component of care. No studies assessed all 14 components. Only seven studies (2.1%) examined components of care across multiple phases of the care pathway.

conclusionsRecently published studies have examined limited segments of patients' experiences of cancer care. To improve psychosocial outcomes among people living with and beyond cancer, there should be a greater focus on patients' experiences across multiple components and the whole care pathway.

Indexed as

HumansNeoplasmsPsycho-OncologyPublicationsQuality of Health CareCancerOncologyPsycho-oncologyPsychosocial careQuality of health careReview

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.