Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891520›Full record

ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology

Emergency penetrating keratoplasty in corneal perforations.

Alina-Cristina Stamate, Călin Petru Tătaru, Mihail Zemba

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Combined umbilical cord patching with amniotic membrane graft for corneal surface reconstruction.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Endothelial cell loss rate after penetrating keratoplasty: optical versus therapeutic grafts.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Management of corneal perforations: An update.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alina-Cristina StamateDepartment of Ophthalmology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Călin Petru TătaruDepartment of Ophthalmology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihail ZembaDepartment of Ophthalmology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal perforations represent an ophthalmological emergency due to their devastating consequences. Emergency treatment is mandatory to try to restore the anatomical integrity of the globe, to salvage useful vision as much as possible and to reduce the possible complications to a minimum. The underlying conditions or disorders responsible for corneal ulcerations, and subsequently for corneal perforations are numerous, and can be either isolated or superimposed. Emergency penetrating keratoplasty is a difficult surgical procedure that is associated with various complications, which can jeopardize the outcome of the eye.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesKeratoplasty, PenetratingCorneal PerforationHumanscorneal perforationsemergencytherapeutic penetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID30891520
PMCPMC6421488
OpenAlexW2918313966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.