ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Metabarcoding for stomach-content analyses of Pygmy devil ray (
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Sequences to Food Webs: DNA Metabarcoding Reshapes Fish Trophic Ecology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Marmot gut microbiomes are stable against dietary variation.Oecologia · 2025Article
- Article
- Secondary predation constrains DNA-based diet reconstruction in two threatened shark species.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Biases in bulk: DNA metabarcoding of marine communities and the methodology involved.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Comprehensive coverage of human last meal components revealed by a forensic DNA metabarcoding approach.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A powerful long metabarcoding method for the determination of complex diets from faecal analysis of the European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis, L. 1758).Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
- Metabarcoding for stomach-content analyses of Pygmy devil ray (Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of high-throughput sequencing to retrieve multi-taxon DNA from different substrates such as water, soil, and stomach contents has enabled species identification without prior knowledge of taxon compositions. Here we used three minibarcodes designed to target mitochondrial COI in plankton, 16S in fish, and 16S in crustaceans, to compare ethanol- and tissue-derived DNA extraction methodologies for metabarcoding. The stomach contents of pygmy devilrays (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.