Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30891064›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019

A Comprehensive Survey of Tools and Software for Active Subnetwork Identification.

Hung Nguyen, Sangam Shrestha, Duc Tran, Adib Shafi, Sorin Draghici, Tin Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Construction and contextualization approaches for protein-protein interaction networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hung NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Sangam ShresthaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Duc TranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Adib ShafiDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Sorin DraghiciDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent focus of computational biology has been to integrate the complementary information available in molecular profiles as well as in multiple network databases in order to identify connected regions that show significant changes under different conditions. This allows for capturing dynamic and condition-specific mechanisms of the underlying phenomena and disease stages. Here we review 22 such integrative approaches for active module identification published over the last decade. This article only focuses on tools that are currently available for use and are well-maintained. We compare these methods focusing on their primary features, integrative abilities, network structures, mathematical models, and implementations. We also provide real-world scenarios in which these methods have been successfully applied, as well as highlight outstanding challenges in the field that remain to be addressed. The main objective of this review is to help potential users and researchers to choose the best method that is suitable for their data and analysis purpose.

Indexed as

active moduleactive subnetworkdata integrationnetwork analysisPPI networksubnetwork identification

Identifiers

PMID30891064
PMCPMC6411791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.