ReviewSexual medicine2019
Twenty Years of Plaque Incision and Grafting for Peyronie's Disease: A Review of Literature.
Review in Sexual medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.The journal of sexual medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Plaque incision and grafting for peyronie's disease: 15-year experience and functional outcomes from a high-volume andrology centre.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- A nationwide multicentric analysis of lengthening corporoplasty with collagene fleece in Peyronie's disease.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Article
- Outcomes of surgical correction of Peyronie's disease with plaque excision and grafting: Comparison of testicular tunica vaginalis graft versus bovine pericardium graft.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- Surgical management of complex curvature in Peyronie's disease.World journal of urology · 2024Review
- Measurement of Oxidative Stress Index (OSI) in Penile Corpora Cavernosa and Peripheral Blood of Peyronie's Disease Patients: A Report of 49 Cases.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Comparison of autologous venous grafts and three types of extracellular matrix grafts in Peyronie's disease surgery.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- A study of the histopathology of collagen fleece (TachoSil) patching of tunica albuginea in the rat penis and a literature review of penile graft materials in experimental animals.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Peyronie's Disease: A Brief Overview.Cureus · 2023Review
- Saphenous Vein Graft for Treatment of Peyronie's Disease, a Comparison between Single and Multiple Graft Reconstruction.World journal of plastic surgery · 2022Article
- ESSM Position Statement on Surgical Treatment of Peyronie's Disease.Sexual medicine · 2022Review
- Home modeling after penile prosthesis implantation in the management of residual curvature in Peyronie's disease.International journal of impotence research · 2021Article
- Long-term outcomes of surgery for Peyronie's disease: focus on patient satisfaction.International journal of impotence research · 2021Observational
- Outcomes of Surgery in Peyronie's Disease Following Intralesional Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Injections.Current urology reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPlaque incision and grafting (PIG) is indicated for men with complex or severe penile curvature and, despite a multitude of incision types and grafting materials having been used, no individual technique has proven superiority.
aimTo assess outcomes following PIG and to understand the operative technique.
methodsA systematic review was performed to find all relevant studies reporting on use of the PIG technique to correct curvature resulting from Peyronie's disease. Studies were included if they had >40 participants, were written in the English language, and no penile prosthesis was implanted.
main outcome measuresPrimary outcome measures included deformity correction, erectile dysfunction, and degree of penile lengthening/shortening. Secondary outcome measures included satisfaction, reoperation rate, and complications.
resultsTwelve studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, which overall report on the results of 1,025 patients. Careful patient selection was critical, with erectile function requiring assessment with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), subjective patient reports, and consideration of whether erections are pharmacologically aided. There was no evidence of superiority in favor of any particular incision type or grafting material, and absorbable sutures were clearly favored. Postoperatively, 4.6%-67.4% required pharmacologically aided erections and 0-11.8% were completely unable to achieve erections. Successful straightening occurred in 80.0%-96.4%, although there was no consistent definition of success. Penile length was unchanged in 44.2%-95.0%; 88.0%-92.0% of the patients were satisfied, and .7%-4.7% required reoperation. Altered sensation occurred in 2.0%-22.5% of patients, of which 80.0%-100.0% was only a transient loss. All outcomes were heterogeneously reported. There are no clear predictive factors for erectile dysfunction following PIG surgery. No single incision type or grafting material has proven superiority.
conclusionPIG is an effective and safe technique for correction of complex or severe penile curvature in terms of satisfaction, length change, straightening, and complications. Rice PG, Somani BK, Rees RW. Twenty Years of Plaque Incision and Grafting for Peyronie's Disease: A Review of Literature. Sex Med 2019;7:115-128.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.