ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019
Non-invasive Measurement of Dynamic Myocardial Stiffness Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Myocardial Stiffness With New Echocardiographic Methods.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Continuous shear wave measurements for dynamic cardiac stiffness evaluation in pigs.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Myocardial Stiffness in Cardiac Amyloidosis Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse and Natural Shear Wave Imaging.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- A guide for assessment of myocardial stiffness in health and disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- A direct comparison of natural and acoustic-radiation-force-induced cardiac mechanical waves.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial stiffness exhibits cyclic variations over the course of the cardiac cycle. These trends are closely tied to the electromechanical and hemodynamic changes in the heart. Characterization of dynamic myocardialstiffness can provide insights into the functional state of the myocardium, as well as allow for differentiation between the underlying physiologic mechanisms that lead to congestive heart failure. Previous work has revealed the potential of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging to capture temporal trends in myocardial stiffness in experimental preparations such as the Langendorff heart, as well as on animals in open-chest and intracardiac settings. This study was aimed at investigating the potential of ARFI to measure dynamic myocardial stiffness in human subjects, in a non-invasive manner through transthoracic imaging windows. ARFI imaging was performed on 12 healthy volunteers to track stiffness changes within the interventricular septum in parasternal long-axis and short-axis views. Myocardial stiffness dynamics over the cardiac cycle was quantified using five indices: stiffness ratio, rates of relaxation and contraction and time constants of relaxation and contraction. The yield of ARFI acquisitions was evaluated based on metrics of signal strength and tracking fidelity such as displacement signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-clutter level, temporal coherence of speckle and spatial similarity within the region of excitation. These were quantified using the mean ARF-induced displacements over the cardiac cycle, the contrast between the myocardium and the cardiac chambers, the minimum correlation coefficients of radiofrequency signals and the correlation between displacement traces across simultaneously acquired azimuthal beams, respectively. Forty-one percent of ARFI acquisitions were determined to be "successful" using a mean ARF-induced displacement threshold of 1.5 μm. "Successful" acquisitions were found to have higher (i) signal-to-clutter levels, (ii) temporal coherence and (iii) spatial similarity compared with "unsuccessful" acquisitions. Median values of these three metrics, between the two groups, were measured to be 13.42dB versus 5.42dB, 0.988 versus 0.976 and 0.984 versus 0.849, respectively. Signal-to-clutter level, temporal coherence and spatial similarity were also found to correlate with each other. Across the cohort of healthy volunteers, the stiffness ratio measured was 2.74 ± 0.86; the rate of relaxation, 7.82 ± 4.69/s; and the rate of contraction, -7.31±3.79 /s. The time constant of relaxation was 35.90 ± 20.04ms, and that of contraction was 37.24 ± 19.85ms. ARFI-derived indices of myocardial stiffness were found to be similar in both views. These results indicate the feasibility of using ARFI to measure dynamic myocardial stiffness trends in a non-invasive manner and also highlightthe technical challenges of implementing this method in the transthoracic imaging environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.