Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30890156›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Development of drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 systems for large-scale functional screening.

Ning Sun, Sakina Petiwala, Rui Wang, Charles Lu, Mufeng Hu, Sujana Ghosh, Yan Hao, Christopher P Miller, Namjin Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Designing libraries for pooled CRISPR functional screens of long noncoding RNAs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  20. Controlling CRISPR with small molecule regulation for somatic cell genome editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ning SunAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. ning.sun@abbvie.com.
Sakina PetiwalaAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Rui WangAbbVie Cambridge Research Center, 200 Sydney St, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Charles LuAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Mufeng HuAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Sujana GhoshAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Yan HaoAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Christopher P MillerAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Namjin ChungAbbVie Inc., 1 North Waukegan Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA. namjin.chung@abbvie.com.
AbbVie (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale genetic screening using CRISPR-Cas9 technology has emerged as a powerful approach to uncover and validate gene functions. The ability to control the timing of genetic perturbation during CRISPR screens will facilitate precise dissection of dynamic and complex biological processes. Here, we report the optimization of a drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system that allows high-throughput gene interrogation with a temporal control.

resultsWe designed multiple drug-inducible sgRNA expression vectors and measured their activities using an EGFP gene disruption assay in 11 human and mouse cell lines. The optimal design allows for a tight and inducible control of gene knockout in vitro, and in vivo during a seven-week-long experiment following hematopoietic reconstitution in mice. We next performed parallel genome-wide loss-of-function screens using the inducible and constitutive CRISPR-Cas9 systems. In proliferation-based dropout screens, these two approaches have similar performance in discriminating essential and nonessential genes. In a more challenging phenotypic assay that requires cytokine stimulation and cell staining, we observed similar sensitivity of the constitutive and drug-induced screening approaches in detecting known hits. Importantly, we demonstrate minimal leakiness of our inducible CRISPR screening platforms in the absence of chemical inducers in large-scale settings.

conclusionsIn this study, we have developed a drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system that shows high cleavage efficiency upon induction but low background activity. Using this system, we have achieved inducible gene disruption in a wide range of cell types both in vitro and in vivo. For the first time, we present a systematic side-by-side comparison of constitutive and drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 platforms in large-scale functional screens. We demonstrate the tightness and efficiency of our drug-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 system in genome-wide pooled screening. Our design increases the versatility of CRISPR-based genetic screening and represents a significant upgrade on existing functional genomics toolbox.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsCarcinoma, Renal CellCell ProliferationCells, CulturedErbB ReceptorsGene TargetingGenetic TestingGenomeHumansKidney NeoplasmsMiceProtein Kinase InhibitorsErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsCRISPRFunctional genomicsGene editing

Identifiers

PMID30890156
PMCPMC6425629
OpenAlexW2937326426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.