Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30890147›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Non-linear regression models for time to flowering in wild chickpea combine genetic and climatic factors.

Konstantin Kozlov, Anupam Singh, Jens Berger, Eric Bishop-von Wettberg, Abdullah Kahraman, Abdulkadir Aydogan, Douglas Cook, Sergey Nuzhdin, Maria Samsonova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Modeling of Flowering Time inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Two Loci,Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Konstantin KozlovPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia.
Anupam SinghProgram Molecular and Computation Biology, University of California, University Park, Los-Angeles, 24105, CA, USA.
Jens BergerCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Agriculture and Food, Underwood Ave, Perth, 6014, WA, Australia.
Eric Bishop-von WettbergDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, 05405, VT, USA.
Abdullah KahramanDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Osmanbey Campus, Sanliurfa, 63100, Turkey.
Abdulkadir AydoganCentral Research Institute for Field Crops (CRIFC), P.O. Box 226, Ankara, 06042, Turkey.
Douglas CookDeptartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, One Shields Ave, Davis, 95616-8680, CA, USA.
Sergey NuzhdinProgram Molecular and Computation Biology, University of California, University Park, Los-Angeles, 24105, CA, USA.
Maria SamsonovaPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29 Polytechnicheskaya, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia. m.g.samsonova@gmail.com.
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUHarran University · TRUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of crop flowering time is required for reaching maximal farm efficiency. Several models developed to accomplish this goal are based on deep knowledge of plant phenology, requiring large investment for every individual crop or new variety. Mathematical modeling can be used to make better use of more shallow data and to extract information from it with higher efficiency. Cultivars of chickpea, Cicer arietanum, are currently being improved by introgressing wild C. reticulatum biodiversity with very different flowering time requirements. More understanding is required for how flowering time will depend on environmental conditions in these cultivars developed by introgression of wild alleles.

resultsWe built a novel model for flowering time of wild chickpeas collected at 21 different sites in Turkey and grown in 4 distinct environmental conditions over several different years and seasons. We propose a general approach, in which the analytic forms of dependence of flowering time on climatic parameters, their regression coefficients, and a set of predictors are inferred automatically by stochastic minimization of the deviation of the model output from data. By using a combination of Grammatical Evolution and Differential Evolution Entirely Parallel method, we have identified a model that reflects the influence of effects of day length, temperature, humidity and precipitation and has a coefficient of determination of R

conclusionsWe used our model to test two important hypotheses. We propose that chickpea phenology may be strongly predicted by accession geographic origin, as well as local environmental conditions at the site of growth. Indeed, the site of origin-by-growth environment interaction accounts for about 14.7% of variation in time period from sowing to flowering. Secondly, as the adaptation to specific environments is blueprinted in genomes, the effects of genes on flowering time may be conditioned on environmental factors. Genotype-by-environment interaction accounts for about 17.2% of overall variation in flowering time. We also identified several genomic markers associated with different reactions to climatic factor changes. Our methodology is general and can be further applied to extend existing crop models, especially when phenological information is limited.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGene-Environment InteractionModels, BiologicalAdaptation, BiologicalCicerFlowersGenotypeGeographyModels, StatisticalPhenotypeRegression AnalysisTurkeyClimatic factorsGWASModelWild chickpea

Identifiers

PMID30890147
PMCPMC6423741
OpenAlexW2923714128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.