Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30889249›Full record

ReviewThe Gerontologist2020

Fifty-Five Years of Research Into Older People's Civic Participation: Recent Trends, Future Directions.

Rodrigo Serrat, Thomas Scharf, Feliciano Villar, Camila Gómez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Gerontologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Age, Political Participation, and Political Context in Africa.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Examining subjective well-being among older adults using pain medications.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodrigo SerratDepartment of Cognition, Development, and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas ScharfInstitute of Health and Society, Sir James Spence Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
Feliciano VillarDepartment of Cognition, Development, and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Camila GómezDepartment of Cognition, Development, and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis study analyzes critically existing knowledge concerning older people's civic participation, pinpoints gaps in the literature, and proposes new directions for research. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of literature on older people's civic participation. To conduct this review, we followed the 5-step framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005; 8: 19-32), and expanded by Levac and colleagues (Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 69).

resultsResearch into older people's civic participation has grown steadily over the past 55 years. However, the increasing number of publications mainly concerns collective forms of social participation, particularly volunteering, with other types of participation being more stable over time. Contextual as well as dynamic aspects of civic participation remain underdeveloped. Diversity of older people is scarcely represented in current research. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review identifies 4 critical gaps in the literature that should be at the forefront of future research. These are classified as conceptual, contextual, processual, and diverse aspects of research into older people's civic participation.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationSocial ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overHumansResearch DesignCitizenshipPolitical participationScoping reviewSocial participationVolunteering

Identifiers

PMID30889249
PMCPMC12774630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.