Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30889085›Full record

SynthesisMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2019

Endometrial safety of low-dose vaginal estrogens in menopausal women: a systematic evidence review.

Ginger D Constantine, Shelli Graham, Kate Lapane, Kathleen Ohleth, Brian Bernick, James Liu, Sebastian Mirkin

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ginger D ConstantineEndoRheum Consultants, LLC, Malvern, PA.
Shelli GrahamTherapeuticsMD, Boca Raton, FL.
Kate LapaneUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Kathleen OhlethPrecise Publications, LLC, Bedminster, NJ.
Brian BernickTherapeuticsMD, Boca Raton, FL.
James LiuUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Sebastian MirkinTherapeuticsMD, Boca Raton, FL.
TherapeuticsMD (United States) · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to systematically review studies that evaluated endometrial hyperplasia or cancer incidence with unopposed vaginal estrogens.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to August 2017 for relevant articles and abstracts. Bibliographies of review articles and abstracts of major women's health medical meetings were examined. Eligible studies (independently reviewed by 4 authors) had to report menopausal vaginal estrogen use and endometrial histology, or incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer.

resultsOf 5,593 abstracts from the literature search and 47 articles from other sources, 36 articles and 2 abstracts were eligible, describing 20 randomized controlled studies, 8 interventional studies, and 10 observational studies. Collectively, the studies did not support an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer with low-dose vaginal estrogens. Rates of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia were 0.03% and 0.4%, respectively, from 20 randomized controlled trials (2,983 women) of vaginal estrogens. Overall, reports of endometrial hyperplasia were observed with various doses and durations and appeared sporadic (except 1.25 mg conjugated equine estrogens), consistent with endometrial hyperplasia rates in the general population. A Denmark registry study was an exception and may be of limited applicability to the United States. The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study showed no association (1.3 cases/1,000 women-years with vaginal estrogens versus 1.0/1,000 women-years for nonuse).

conclusionThis systematic review supports the use of low-dose vaginal estrogens for treating vulvar and vaginal atrophy in menopausal women without a concomitant progestogen. This review does not support increased endometrial hyperplasia or cancer risk with low-dose, unopposed vaginal estrogens; however, longer-term, real-world data are needed.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineMenopauseAdministration, IntravaginalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndometrial HyperplasiaEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsUnited StatesWomen's HealthEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)

Identifiers

PMID30889085
PMCPMC6636806
OpenAlexW2945051508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.