Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30888646›Full record

Trial reportPathology oncology research : POR2020

Acute and Late Toxicity after Moderate Hypofractionation with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. A Single Institution, Prospective Study.

Kliton Jorgo, Csaba Polgar, Tibor Major, Gabor Stelczer, Andras Herein, Tamas Pocza, Laszlo Gesztesi, Peter Agoston

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In reply to Afkhami Ardekani M et al.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  5. Comparative dosimetrical analysis of intensity-modulated arc therapy, CyberKnife therapy and image-guided interstitial HDR and LDR brachytherapy of low risk prostate cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kliton JorgoCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary. jorgokliton@gmail.com.
Csaba PolgarCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Tibor MajorCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Gabor StelczerCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Andras HereinCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Tamas PoczaCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Laszlo GesztesiCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.
Peter AgostonCentre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

asbtractTo evaluate the acute and late toxicity using moderately hypofractionated, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to prostate for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. From 2015 to 2017, 162 patients were treated with IMRT with SIB to the prostate. IMRT plans were designed to deliver 50.4Gy in 28 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction) to the pelvic lymph nodes (whole pelvis radiotherapy, WPRT) while simultaneously delivering 57.4 Gy in 28 fractions (2.05 Gy/fraction) to the seminal vesicles and 70 Gy in 28 fractions (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate for high risk patients. For intermediate risk patients the same technique was applied, without WPRT. Acute and cumulative late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring system. Of the 162 patients enrolled, 156 (96%) completed the treatment as planned. The median follow-up time was 30 months. Seventy-eight patients (48.2%) were treated with WPRT. The rate of acute grade ≥ 2 GI and GU toxicities in all patients were 22% and 58%, respectively. The rate of cumulative late grade ≥ 2 GI and GU toxicities were 11% and 17%, respectively. Acute grade 3 GI and GU toxicities occurred in 1% and 1%. Late grade 3 GI and GU side effects occurred in 5% and 4%, respectively. None of the patients developed grade ≥ 4 toxicity. IMRT with SIB technique using moderate hypofractionation to the prostate is feasible treatment option for intermediate and high risk patients, associated with low rate of severe GU and GI toxicities.

Indexed as

Radiation Dose HypofractionationAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedImage-guided radiotherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapyModerate hypofractionationProstate cancerSimultaneous integrated boost

Identifiers

PMID30888646
PMCPMC7242260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.