Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30888558›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

NRG brain tumor specialists consensus guidelines for glioblastoma contouring.

Tim J Kruser, Walter R Bosch, Shahed N Badiyan, Joseph A Bovi, Amol J Ghia, Michelle M Kim, Abhishek A Solanki, Sean Sachdev, Christina Tsien, Tony J C Wang and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tim J KruserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 251 E Huron St, LC-178, Galter Pavilion, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. tkruser@nm.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-2372
Walter R BoschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Shahed N BadiyanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joseph A BoviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michelle M KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abhishek A SolankiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
Sean SachdevDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 251 E Huron St, LC-178, Galter Pavilion, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Christina TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tony J C WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Minesh P MehtaMiami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Kevin P McMullenColumbus Regional Health, Columbus, IN, USA.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803NIH HHS U24 CA180803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNRG protocols for glioblastoma allow for clinical target volume (CTV) reductions at natural barriers; however, literature examining CTV contouring and the relevant white matter pathways is lacking. This study proposes consensus CTV guidelines, with a focus on areas of controversy while highlighting common errors in glioblastoma target delineation.

methodsTen academic radiation oncologists specializing in brain tumor treatment contoured CTVs on four glioblastoma cases. CTV expansions were based on NRG trial guidelines. Contour consensus was assessed and summarized by kappa statistics. A meeting was held to discuss the mathematically averaged contours and form consensus contours and recommendations.

resultsContours of the cavity plus enhancement (mean kappa 0.69) and T2-FLAIR signal (mean kappa 0.74) showed moderate to substantial agreement. Experts were asked to trim off anatomic barriers while respecting pathways of spread to develop their CTVs. Submitted CTV_4600 (mean kappa 0.80) and CTV_6000 (mean kappa 0.81) contours showed substantial to near perfect agreement. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours were then reviewed and modified by group consensus. Anatomic trimming reduced the amount of total brain tissue planned for radiation targeting by a 13.6% (range 8.7-17.9%) mean proportional reduction. Areas for close scrutiny of target delineation were described, with accompanying recommendations.

conclusionsConsensus contouring guidelines were established based on expert contours. Careful delineation of anatomic pathways and barriers to spread can spare radiation to uninvolved tissue without compromising target coverage. Further study is necessary to accurately define optimal target volumes beyond isometric expansion techniques for individual patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsClinical ProtocolsGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedClinical target volumeConsensusContouringGlioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID30888558
PMCPMC6483830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.