Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30888517›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2019

Self-Collection and Molecular Diagnosis for Detection of Human Papillomavirus: Why Incorporate It?

Larissa Zatorre Almeida-Lugo, Camila Mareti Bonin-Jacob, Vanessa Terezinha Gubert de Matos, Inês Aparecida Tozetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa Zatorre Almeida-LugoPostgraduate Program of Infectious and Parasitary Diseases from Medicine School, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Camila Mareti Bonin-JacobPostgraduate Program of Infectious and Parasitary Diseases from Medicine School, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Vanessa Terezinha Gubert de MatosMedicine School, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. vanessa.matos@ufms.br.
Inês Aparecida TozettiBioscience Institute from Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCervical cancer, the third cause of death by cancer among Brazil's women, is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. In some countries of South America, North America, Europe, and Oceania, initial screening for HPV DNA and subsequent follow-up with HPV-positive patients using colposcopy and cytological testing are used as preventative measures. RECENT

findingsFor HPV DNA detection, it is necessary to obtain cervical cells by conventional clinical collection method or self-collection of the cells that flake off from the uterine cervix and vaginal canal. Self-collection has been shown to be a viable option for obtaining samples and is a less invasive method that is more accepted by women. Thus, it can potentially decrease the limitations of the conventional clinical collection methods. The efficiency of the self-collection method aligned with the implementation of HPV molecular testing, if adopted by public and private health care systems, may extend the reach of current cervical cancer prevention efforts. In addition, considering all phases from triage to treatment, this method may reduce health care costs and the time spent by patients and health care teams to conduct examinations and collect samples.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerDiagnosis, self-collection methodHPVMolecular testingPrevention

Identifiers

PMID30888517
OpenAlexW2924422995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.