ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019
[SMAR
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are renal stone protocol computed tomography reports giving us enough information?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- [Care of the severely injured in mass casualty incidents : What is the difference compared to emergency room management?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Terrorist incidents: strategic treatment objectives, tactical diagnostic procedures and the estimated need of blood and clotting products.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary computed tomography (CT) plays an increasingly important role in diagnosing life-threatening conditions in polytrauma patients; however, it is associated with two major problems: suboptimal interobserver reliability with unstructured reports especially when the reporting is undertaken by physicians in training during working hours and a delay in beginning urgent surgical interventions, which is mainly due to the time taken until the CT report is available and less to the technical time necessary for the CT. This is why the clinical benefits of a primary CT scan in hemodynamically unstable patients after polytrauma is currently under interdisciplinary discussion.
objectiveThe present study focused on the development and evaluation of a standardized imaging and reporting protocol for initial CT diagnostics of injuries that need immediate treatment after polytrauma.
methodsIn this study 30 patients after polytrauma were subjected to a novel imaging and reporting protocol, SMAR
resultsThe application of the SMAR
conclusionBased on the results of 30 CT scans in polytraumatized patients, the SMAR
Indexed as
Identifiers
30888436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.