Trial reportMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2019
Prediction of renal allograft chronic rejection using a model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Trial report in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State-of-the-Art Renal Imaging in Children.Pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Prediction of renal allograft chronic rejection using a model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2019Trial
- Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction: A pilot study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Quantitative ultrasound for non-invasive evaluation of subclinical rejection in renal transplantation.European radiology · 2023Article
- Noninvasive quantification of granzyme B in cardiac allograft rejection using targeted ultrasound imaging.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Compared with MRI and CT in the Evaluation of Post-Renal Transplant Complications.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Review
- Kidney Ultrasound for Nephrologists: A Review.Kidney medicine · 2022Review
- Factors influencing the time-intensity curve analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in kidney transplanted patients: Toward a standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of transplant organs - liver and kidney - in children.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing complications after kidney transplant.World journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Meet Our Executive Guest Editor.Current genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for the diagnosis of renal allograft chronic rejection (CR).
methodsA total of 104 patients who were suspected to have AR or CR were enrolled in this study (derivation group, n = 66; validation group, n = 38). Before biopsy, all patients received an ultrasound examination.
resultsIn the CR group, rising time (RT) and time to peak (TTP) of medulla (RTm and TTPm, respectively) were significantly longer compared to those in the AR group. The kidney volume was significantly decreased in the CR group but was increased in the AR group. In the derivation group, age, change in kidney volume, and TTPm were identified as independent predictors by multivariate analysis. Based on the multivariate analysis results and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUROCs) of individual markers, we constructed a new index as follows: P = -5.424 + 0.074 × age -9.818 × kidney volume change + 0.115 × TTPm; New Index = e
conclusionIn conclusion, the new index provides a new diagnosis model for CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.