Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887623›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2019

What is the marginal benefit of payment-induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients.

Norma B Coe, Jing Guo, R Tamara Konetzka, Courtney Harold Van Houtven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Empowering Older Veterans Through Self-Directed Care: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Technology Enabled Respite Homecare Model Pilot.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Family spillovers and long-term care insurance.Journal of health economics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norma B CoePerelman School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-0938
Jing GuoAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
R Tamara KonetzkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-1318
Courtney Harold Van HoutvenDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-1611

Funding

Effects of Informal Care for persons with Alzheimer's Disease and related dementiasR01AG057501 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057501NIH HHS R01AG057501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on home-based long-term care has centered almost solely on the costs; there has been very little, if any, attention paid to the relative benefits. This study exploits the randomization built into the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation program that directly impacted the likelihood of having family involved in home care delivery. Randomization in the trial is used as an instrumental variable for family involvement in care, resulting in a causal estimate of the effect of changing the combination of home health-care providers on health-care utilization and health outcomes of the beneficiary. We find that some family involvement in home-based care significantly decreases health-care utilization: lower likelihood of emergency room use, Medicaid-financed inpatient days, any Medicaid hospital expenditures, and fewer months with Medicaid-paid inpatient use. We find that individuals who have some family involved in home-based care are less likely to have several adverse health outcomes within the first 9 months of the trial, including lower prevalence of infections, bedsores, or shortness of breath, suggesting that the lower utilization may be due to better health outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost SavingsFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLongitudinal StudiesLong-Term CareMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedUnited Statescash and counselinginformal careinstrumental variablesMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID30887623
PMCPMC6528172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.