Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887413›Full record

ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2019

General Medical Clinicians' Attitudes Toward People with Serious Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.

Elizabeth M Stone, Lisa Nawei Chen, Gail L Daumit, Sarah Linden, Emma E McGinty

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. End-of-life care for people with severe and persistent mental illness and a life-limiting disease: An umbrella review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Severe Mental Illness.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Stigma towards Mental Disorders among Nursing Students and Professionals: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth M StoneDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2024 E Monument Street, Room 2-620, Baltimore, MD, USA. estone@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5676-1499
Lisa Nawei ChenDivision of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gail L DaumitDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2024 E Monument Street, Room 2-620, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah LindenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2024 E Monument Street, Room 2-620, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emma E McGintyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Using an innovative quality improvement process to increase delivery of evidenced-based CVD risk factor care in community mental health organizationsP50MH115842 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2018 to 2026
$16.2M
Improving Evidence-based Behavioral, Somatic and Social Service Delivery for SMIK01MH106631 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCGINTY, EMMA ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2018
$711k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH106631NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience significant premature mortality due to somatic conditions but often receive sub-optimal somatic care, but little research has been done to understand how general medical clinicians' attitudes may affect care provision or health outcomes. This review describes general medical clinicians' attitudes toward people with SMI, compares these attitudes to attitudes among mental health clinicians or toward individuals without SMI, and examines the relationship between attitudes and clinical decision making. Seventeen studies were reviewed. General medical clinicians reported negative attitudes toward individuals with SMI. These attitudes were generally more negative than attitudes among mental health clinicians and were consistently more negative when compared to attitudes toward individuals without SMI. Four studies suggest that these negative attitudes have an adverse effect on clinician decision making.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMental DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30887413
PMCPMC7251232
OpenAlexW2922264683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.