Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887389›Full record

ArticleJournal of fluorescence2019

Manifestation of Peaks in a Live Firefly Flash.

Angana Goswami, Prodeep Phukan, Anurup Gohain Barua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angana GoswamiDepartment of Physics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, India.
Prodeep PhukanDepartment of Chemistry, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, India.
Anurup Gohain BaruaDepartment of Physics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, India. agohainbarua@yahoo.com.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Government of India BT/PR4855/BRB/10/1030/2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have been carried out on flashing of fireflies till now. From patterns of its flashes in different ambient conditions, different conclusions have been drawn and hypotheses put forward. Here we observe flashes emitted by two Indian species of firefly Luciola praeusta and Asymmetricata circumdata. For the species L. praeusta, as the temperature is lowered below about 21 °C, simple pulses become compound or combination ones. Males begin to emit bi-modal flashes while females emit both bi- and tri-modal flashes, along with the simple ones, in a regular manner. For the species A. circumdata, this feature is evident even at their normal flashing temperatures. Though rare, three-peaked flashes do appear from male specimens of both these species, and decay times of all the three peaks in a male- or a female-flash come out to be a few tens of, or a hundred-odd, milliseconds - in contrast to the nanosecond lifetimes determined by different workers for different analogs of the light emitter molecule oxyluciferin. We propose that the tri-modal feature in a flash represents three luminescent forms of the excited state of oxyluciferin, which in the normal flashing state in the living firefly decays via a pathway followed by molecules exhibiting phosphorescence.

Indexed as

Luminescent MeasurementsAnimalsFemaleFirefliesMaleSpecies SpecificityTemperatureFirefly bioluminescenceLifetimeOxyluciferin formsPhosphorescenceThree-peaked flash

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.