Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887269›Full record

ArticleThe patient2019

Validity and Reliability of a Novel Multimodal Questionnaire for the Assessment of Abdominal Symptoms in People with Cystic Fibrosis (CFAbd-Score).

Anke Jaudszus, Elisa Zeman, Tatjana Jans, Elena Pfeifer, Harold Tabori, Christin Arnold, Ruth K Michl, Michael Lorenz, Natalie Beiersdorf, Jochen G Mainz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03052283 (Evaluation and Validation of a New Questionnaire to Identify and Quantify Abdominal Symptoms in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Following FDA Guidelines), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03052283 recruitingnot on this map

Evaluation and Validation of a New Questionnaire to Identify and Quantify Abdominal Symptoms in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Following FDA Guidelines: the CF Abd-Score (Primarily Named JenAbdomen-CF Score)

TypeobservationalSponsorMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor FontaneRan2017 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsCystic FibrosisArmsQuestionnaire Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prebiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Timing of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) in cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. The measurement properties of tests and tools used in cystic fibrosis studies: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Multicenter prospective study showing a high gastrointestinal symptom burden in cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association between stool consistency and clinical variables among infants with cystic fibrosis: Findings from the BONUS study.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Designing the GALAXY study: Partnering with the cystic fibrosis community to optimize assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2021
    Observational
  20. Utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in cystic fibrosis research: Application to the GALAXY study.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anke JaudszusCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. anke.jaudszus@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-6410
Elisa ZemanCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Tatjana JansCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Elena PfeiferCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Harold TaboriDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Christin ArnoldCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ruth K MichlCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Michael LorenzCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Natalie BeiersdorfCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jochen G MainzCystic Fibrosis Center for Children and Adults, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveFor people with cystic fibrosis, validated patient-reported outcome measures for the assessment of the complex abdominal involvement are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine whether the CFAbd-Score, a novel questionnaire consisting of 28 items, meets the essential requirements (validity and reliability) for a patient-reported outcome measure according to US Food and Drug Administration recommendations.

methodsContent validity was assessed by recording the frequencies and severity of symptoms that occurred during the prior 2 weeks in patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 116; aged ≥ 6 years). Comparing the CFAbd-Score results obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis and healthy controls (n = 88), we determined known-groups validity. To explore the structure of the patient-reported outcome measure, a factor analysis was conducted. Internal consistency of the five extracted score domains was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. For test-retest reliability, a subgroup of patients (n = 43) was reevaluated and intra-class correlation coefficients were determined.

resultsThe CFAbd-Score differentiated patients with cystic fibrosis from healthy controls with a large effect size (17.3 ± 1.1 vs. 8.0 ± 0.7 points; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.85). Items, domains, and scores reflected the relevance to patients with cystic fibrosis and allowed a differentiation between subgroups of patients with cystic fibrosis (e.g., patients with and without abdominal pain, pancreatic sufficiency, and age groups). High item-domain loadings as well as good to excellent internal consistency and reproducibility (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.92; intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.932, 95% confidence interval 0.874-0.963) indicated construct validity and reliability.

conclusionsThe CFAbd-Score has successfully passed through key steps of the iterative process of patient-reported outcome measure development. Prospectively, the CFAbd-Score is proposed as a patient-centered instrument for monitoring abdominal symptoms and, most interestingly, for evaluating changes in symptoms with novel treatments such as cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator modulators. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03052283.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentAdultChildCystic FibrosisFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesGermanyHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30887269
OpenAlexW2920936362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.