Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887244›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Evaluation of the content coverage of questionnaires containing basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) used in adult patients with brain tumors.

Quirien Oort, Martin J B Taphoorn, Sietske A M Sikkes, Bernard M J Uitdehaag, Jaap C Reijneveld, Linda Dirven

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Development of an EORTC questionnaire measuring instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in patients with brain tumours: phase I-III.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quirien OortDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), PO BOX 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. q.oort@vumc.nl.
Martin J B TaphoornDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sietske A M SikkesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernard M J UitdehaagDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), PO BOX 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Location VUmc), PO BOX 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda DirvenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-9895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEveryday functioning can be assessed using measures of basic activities of daily living (BADL) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the scope and specific content of BADL and/or IADL covered by currently used questionnaires in adult brain tumor patient studies.

methodsElectronic databases were searched up to April 2017 to identify all eligible questionnaires with items regarding BADL/IADL in studies with adult brain tumor patients. Articles were selected using predetermined in- and exclusion criteria. Items with similar content were clustered into domains based on type of activity.

resultsThirty-one unique questionnaires containing at least one BADL and/or IADL item were identified; 21 and 29 questionnaires containing ≥ 1 BADL or IADL item, respectively. The percentage of ADL items in these questionnaires ranged from 4 to 100%. Only two questionnaires were specifically developed to measure BADL (Barthel Index and Katz-ADL) and two specifically for IADL (Lawton-Brody IADL and preliminary IADL-BN). Content clustering revealed that IADL had a larger variation in content (31 domains, e.g. work or leisure time activities) compared to BADL (15 domains, e.g. mobility or bathing/washing).

conclusionThirty-one questionnaires previously used in brain tumor studies contained items on BADL and/or IADL and covered a wide range of content, in particular for IADL. It is currently unclear which BADL/IADL are most relevant for brain tumor patients, and this should therefore be evaluated. Next, existing questionnaires could be adapted or validated, or new measures can be developed to meet these needs.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSurveys and QuestionnairesBrain NeoplasmsHumansActivities of daily livingADLBrain tumorDaily functioningGlioma

Identifiers

PMID30887244
PMCPMC6482128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.