Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887125›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Establishing effective patient navigation programs in oncology.

Diego Lopez, Mandi L Pratt-Chapman, Elizabeth A Rohan, Lisa Kennedy Sheldon, Karen Basen-Engquist, Ron Kline, Lawrence N Shulman, Efren J Flores

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Re-defining the future of cancer peer support: implementation, research, and policy considerations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toward a multi-level, needs-based approach to cancer navigation: Considerations for service design.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Moderated mediating effects of perceived loneliness and economic burden between social support and mental health for lung cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Development and Evaluation of Patient Navigation Training for Rural and Appalachian Populations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  16. The relationship of chronic disease conditions to mental and physical health among cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Training cancer caregiver navigators: experiences from implementing the eSNAP and caregiver navigator intervention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diego LopezHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mandi L Pratt-ChapmanThe George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth A RohanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA.
Lisa Kennedy SheldonOncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Karen Basen-EngquistUniversity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ron KlineCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lawrence N ShulmanUniversity of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Efren J FloresMassachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA. ejflores@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent advances in cancer treatment have resulted in greatly improved survival, and yet many patients in the USA have not benefited due to poor access to healthcare and difficulty accessing timely care across the cancer care continuum. Recognizing these issues and the need to facilitate discussions on how to improve navigation services for patients with cancer, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) held a workshop entitled, "Establishing Effective Patient Navigation Programs in Oncology. The purpose of this manuscript is to disseminate the conclusions of this workshop while providing a clinically relevant review of patient navigation in oncology.

designNarrative literature review and summary of workshop discussions

resultsPatient navigation has been shown to be effective at improving outcomes throughout the spectrum of cancer care. Work remains to develop consensus on scope of practice and evaluation criteria and to align payment incentives and policy.

conclusionPatient navigation plays an essential role in overcoming patient- and system-level barriers to improve access to cancer care and outcomes for those most in need.

Indexed as

HumansNeoplasmsPatient NavigationCancer care barriersOncologyPatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID30887125
PMCPMC8811719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.