Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30887059›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2019

Tobacco smoking and dopaminergic function in humans: a meta-analysis of molecular imaging studies.

Abhishekh H Ashok, Yuya Mizuno, Oliver D Howes

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhishekh H AshokPsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences Centre (LMS), Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-7253
Yuya MizunoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK.
Oliver D HowesPsychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences Centre (LMS), Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. oliver.howes@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council MC_U120097115Medical Research Council MR/L022176/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Medical Research Council MR/N027078/1MRC MC-A656-5QD30Wellcome Trust 094849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAbout 1.1 billion people smoke tobacco globally and tobacco-related health care costs 1.8% of GDP in many countries. The majority of people are unable to quit smoking despite pharmacological intervention, highlighting the need to understand the pathophysiology associated with tobacco smoking to aid the development of new therapeutics. The reinforcing effects of tobacco smoking are thought to be mediated by the dopamine system. However, the nature of dopamine dysfunction seen in smokers is unclear.

objectiveTo determine the nature and robustness of the evidence for dopaminergic alterations in smokers.

methodsThe entire MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies from inception date to November 18, 2018. In vivo human molecular imaging studies of dopamine measures (dopamine synthesis or release capacity, transporter levels, receptor levels) in tobacco smokers were selected. Demographic, clinical, and imaging measures were extracted from each study and meta-analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total sample of 219 tobacco smokers and 297 controls. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in dopamine transporter availability in the smokers relative to controls with an effect size of - 0.72 ([95% CI, - 1.38 to - 0.05], p = 0.03). However, there was no difference in D2/3 receptor availability in smokers relative to controls (d = -0.16 ([95% CI, - 0.42 to 0.1], p = 0.23). There were insufficient studies for meta-analysis of other measures. However, findings from the published studies indicated blunted dopamine release and lower D1 receptor availability, while findings for dopamine synthesis capacity were inconsistent.

conclusionOur data indicate that striatal dopamine transporter availability is lower but D2/3 receptors are unaltered in smokers relative to controls. We discuss the putative mechanisms underlying this and their implications.

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsHumansMolecular ImagingReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2SmokersTobacco SmokingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonDopamineDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2SLC6A3 protein, humanDopamineMeta-analysisMolecular imaging studiesTobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID30887059
PMCPMC6591186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.