Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886973›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2018

In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494).

Julie M Parmentier, Jeff Voss, Candace Graff, Annette Schwartz, Maria Argiriadi, Michael Friedman, Heidi S Camp, Robert J Padley, Jonathan S George, Deborah Hyland and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 360 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie M Parmentier1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Jeff Voss1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Candace Graff1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Annette Schwartz1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Maria Argiriadi1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Michael Friedman1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Heidi S Camp2Immunology Clinical Development, AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064 USA.
Robert J Padley2Immunology Clinical Development, AbbVie, 1 North Waukegan Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064 USA.
Jonathan S George1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Deborah Hyland1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Matthew Rosebraugh3Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL USA.
Neil Wishart1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Lisa Olson1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.
Andrew J Long1Immunology Discovery Research, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, 100 Research Dr, Worcester, MA 01605 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4190-4781
AbbVie (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-cytokine therapies such as adalimumab, tocilizumab, and the small molecule JAK inhibitor tofacitinib have proven that cytokines and their subsequent downstream signaling processes are important in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, is the first approved JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA and has been shown to be effective in managing disease. However, in phase 2 dose-ranging studies tofacitinib was associated with dose-limiting tolerability and safety issues such as anemia. Upadacitinib (ABT-494) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor that was engineered to address the hypothesis that greater JAK1 selectivity over other JAK family members will translate into a more favorable benefit:risk profile. Upadacitinib selectively targets JAK1 dependent disease drivers such as IL-6 and IFNγ, while reducing effects on reticulocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, which potentially contributed to the tolerability issues of tofacitinib.

methodsStructure-based hypotheses were used to design the JAK1 selective inhibitor upadacitinib. JAK family selectivity was defined with in vitro assays including biochemical assessments, engineered cell lines, and cytokine stimulation. In vivo selectivity was defined by the efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib in a rat adjuvant induced arthritis model, activity on reticulocyte deployment, and effect on circulating NK cells. The translation of the preclinical JAK1 selectivity was assessed in healthy volunteers using ex vivo stimulation with JAK-dependent cytokines.

resultsHere, we show the structural basis for the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib, along with the in vitro JAK family selectivity profile and subsequent in vivo physiological consequences. Upadacitinib is ~ 60 fold selective for JAK1 over JAK2, and > 100 fold selective over JAK3 in cellular assays. While both upadacitinib and tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in a rat model of arthritis, the increased selectivity of upadacitinib for JAK1 resulted in a reduced effect on reticulocyte deployment and NK cell depletion relative to efficacy. Ex vivo pharmacodynamic data obtained from Phase I healthy volunteers confirmed the JAK1 selectivity of upadactinib in a clinical setting.

conclusionsThe data presented here highlight the JAK1 selectivity of upadacinitinib and supports its use as an effective therapy for the treatment of RA with the potential for an improved benefit:risk profile.

Indexed as

Arthritis, rheumatoidJAK inhibitorKinaseSelectivity

Identifiers

PMID30886973
PMCPMC6390583
OpenAlexW2884090647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.