ArticleCurrent opinion in systems biology2018
Neuro-evo-devo in the single cell sequencing era.
Article in Current opinion in systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A comprehensive temporal patterning gene network in Drosophila medulla neuroblasts revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Integration of Spatial and Temporal Patterning in the Invertebrate and Vertebrate Nervous System.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- ON selectivity in theeLife · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The nervous system represents the most complex tissue in animals. How this complexity evolved has been a challenging question to address. The explosion in single cell sequencing techniques, the development of new algorithms to cluster single cells into cell types, along with powerful tools for drawing developmental trajectories offer a unique opportunity to compare homologous cell types between species. They further permit the identification of key developmental points and transcription factors that can lead to the evolution of new cell types. At the same time, the ease of use and efficiency of CRISPR genome editing technology allow validation of predicted regulators. This promises exciting developments in the next few years in the field of neuronal evolution and development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.