Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886935›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a "birth environment room" versus a standard labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience.

Iben Lorentzen, Charlotte Sander Andersen, Henriette Svenstrup Jensen, Ann Fogsgaard, Maralyn Foureur, Finn Friis Lauszus, Ellen Aagaard Nohr

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02478385 nacompletednot on this map

Birth Environment of the Future - a Randomised Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHerning HospitalRan2015 to 2018Enrolled680ConditionsPregnancyArmsSupportive care in a specially designed labour room
NCT04888013 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Birth Environment and Childbirth-stress, Birth Control & Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled129ConditionsChildbirth Problems, Birth, DelayedArmsPositive Birth Environment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iben LorentzenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Charlotte Sander AndersenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Henriette Svenstrup JensenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Ann FogsgaardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Maralyn FoureurCentre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 11, Room 109, Building 10, City Campus, PO Box 123 Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Finn Friis LauszusDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Ellen Aagaard NohrResearch Unit for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the last decade, there has been an increased interest in exploring the impact of the physical birth environment on birth outcomes. The birth environment might have an important role in facilitating the production of the hormone oxytocin that causes contractions during labour. Oxytocin is released in a safe, secure and confidence-inducing environment, and environments focused on technology and medical interventions to achieve birth may disrupt the production of oxytocin and slow down the progress of labour. An experimental "birth environment room" was designed, inspired by knowledge from evidence-based healthcare design, which advocates bringing nature into the room to reduce stress. The purpose is to examine whether the 'birth environment room', with its design and decor to minimise stress, has an impact on birth outcomes and the birth experience of the woman and her partner. MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomised controlled trial will recruit 680 nulliparous women at term who will be randomly allocated to either the "birth environment room" or a standard room. The study will take place at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Herning Hospital, with recruitment from May 2015. Randomisation to either the "birth environment room" or standard room takes place just before admission to a birth room during labour. The primary outcome is augmentation of labour, and the study has 80% power to detect a 10% difference between the two groups (two-sided α = 0.05). Secondary outcomes are duration of labour, use of pharmacological pain relief, mode of birth, and rating of the birth experience by women and their partners.

trial registrationNCT02478385(10/08/2016).

Identifiers

PMID30886935
PMCPMC6402376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.