Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886903›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2019

An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.

Nichola J Raihani, Vaughan Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The International Consortium on Paranoia Research: an introduction.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Value Representations of Spite Sensitivity in Psychosis on the Minnesota Trust Game.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of the Delusional Interpretation Scale and examination of related variables.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nichola J RaihaniDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK. nicholaraihani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-9889
Vaughan BellDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8616-4847
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paranoia is the most common symptom of psychosis but paranoid concerns occur throughout the general population. Here, we argue for an evolutionary approach to paranoia across the spectrum of severity that accounts for its complex social phenomenology - including the perception of conspiracy and selective identification of perceived persecutors - and considers how it can be understood in light of our evolved social cognition. We argue that the presence of coalitions and coordination between groups in competitive situations could favour psychological mechanisms that detect, anticipate and avoid social threats. Our hypothesis makes testable predictions about the environments in which paranoia should be most common as well as the developmental trajectory of paranoia across the lifespan. We suggest that paranoia should not solely be viewed as a pathological symptom of a mental disorder but also as a part of a normally-functioning human psychology.

Identifiers

PMID30886903
PMCPMC6420131
OpenAlexW2833206376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.