Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886778›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Circadian disruption and divergent microbiota acquisition under extended photoperiod regimens in chicken.

Anne-Sophie Charlotte Hieke, Shawna Marie Hubert, Giridhar Athrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Circadian immunity from bench to bedside: a practical guide.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Key Farm Management Practices on Pullets Welfare-A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of Housing Environment on the Immune System in Chickens: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne-Sophie Charlotte HiekePoultry Science Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Shawna Marie HubertPoultry Science Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Giridhar AthreyPoultry Science Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-9884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is crucial for metabolic homeostasis, immunity, growth and overall health, and it is recognized that early-life microbiota acquisition is a pivotal event for later-life health. Recent studies show that gut microbiota diversity and functional activity are synchronized with the host circadian rhythms in healthy individuals, and circadian disruption elicits dysbiosis in mammalian models. However, no studies have determined the associations between circadian disruption in early life, microbiota colonization, and the consequences for microbiota structure in birds. Chickens, as a major source of protein around the world, are one of the most important agricultural species, and their gut and metabolic health are significant concerns. The poultry industry routinely employs extended photoperiods (>18 h light) as a management tool, and their impacts on the chicken circadian, its role in gut microbiota acquisition in early life (first 3 weeks of life), and consequences for later life microbiota structure remain unknown. In this study, the objectives were to (a) characterize circadian activity under two different light regimes in layer chicken (12/12 h' Light/Dark (LD) and 23/1 h LD), (b) characterize gut microbiota acquisition and composition in the first 4 weeks of life, (c) determine if gut microbiota oscillate in synchrony with the host circadian rhythm, and (d) to determine if fecal microbiota is representative of cecal microbiota in early life. Expression of clock genes (

Indexed as

Cecal microbiotaCircadian disruptionFecal microbiotaGut healthMicrobiota acquisitionPhotoperiodsPoultry

Identifiers

PMID30886778
PMCPMC6421066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.