Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886776›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Natapol Pumipuntu, Witawat Tunyong, Narisara Chantratita, Pornphan Diraphat, Pornpan Pumirat, Nitat Sookrung, Wanpen Chaicumpa, Nitaya Indrawattana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  2. TheJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Characterization ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CaninePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natapol PumipuntuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology/Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Witawat TunyongDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology/Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narisara ChantratitaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology/Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornphan DiraphatDepartment of Microbiology/Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornpan PumiratDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology/Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nitat SookrungBiomedical Research Incubator Unit/Department of Research/Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanpen ChaicumpaCenter of Excellence on Therapeutic Proteins and Antibody Engineering/Department of Parasitology/Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nitaya IndrawattanaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology/Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THMahidol University · THSiriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsMilk samples were collected from 224 cows of 52 dairy herds in four central and northeast provinces. Total somatic cell counts (SCC) and California mastitis test (CMT) were used to identify SCM cows. Milk samples were cultured for

resultsFrom the 224 milk samples of 224 cows, 132 (59%) were positive for SCM by SCC and CMT and 229 staphylococcal isolates were recovered. They were 32 coagulase-positive (24 CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE: This is the first report on the

Indexed as

Antimicrobial susceptibilityBovine mastitisCoagulase-negative staphylococciStaphylococcus argenteusStaphylococcus aureusVirulence genes

Identifiers

PMID30886776
PMCPMC6421060
OpenAlexW2921415598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.