Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886705›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant

Tianshui Niu, Qixia Luo, Yaqing Li, Yanzi Zhou, Wei Yu, Yonghong Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Evidence-based Recommendations for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistantIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Phage Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Sulbactam for carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection & chemotherapy · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Navigating Available Treatment Options for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tianshui Niu1Collaborative Initiative Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, college of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Qixia Luo1Collaborative Initiative Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, college of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Yaqing Li2Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Yanzi Zhou1Collaborative Initiative Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, college of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Wei YuZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Yonghong Xiao1Collaborative Initiative Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, college of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003 China.
Zhejiang University · CNState Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious DiseasesWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam therapies on the prognosis of patients with carbapenem-resistant Methods: CRAB-BSI patients receiving tigecycline therapy or cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy between January 2012 and December 2017 was enrolled, and strict exclusion criteria were followed. The 28-day mortality of patients was analyzed. The impact of cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy on prognosis was evaluated using Cox multivariate regression analysis. The 28-day mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam monotherapy and cefoperazone/sulbactam-based combination therapy was also compared. Results: Three hundred forty eight patients with CRAB-BSI were enrolled in the study. Two hundred ten patients were included after applying the exclusion criteria. Of these, 135 patients received tigecycline therapy and 75 patients received cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy. The 28-day mortality of patients in the latter group was, significantly lower than that of the tigecycline group [29.3% vs. 51.9%; Conclusions: Patients treated with cefoperazone/sulbactam therapy had a better clinical outcome. The mortality of patients receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam with imipenem/cilastatin seems to be the lowest.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCarbapenemsCefoperazoneChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCefoperazoneSulbactamTigecyclineAcinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem resistanceCefoperazone/sulbactamTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID30886705
PMCPMC6404342
OpenAlexW2937156583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.