ArticleHealth information science and systems2019
Words prediction based on N-gram model for free-text entry in electronic health records.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limitations of current copyright frameworks for large language models trained on scientific literature.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Cross-lingual Natural Language Processing on Limited Annotated Case/Radiology Reports in English and Japanese: Insights from the Real-MedNLP Workshop.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Guest Editorial: Special issue on "Application of artificial intelligence in health research".Health information science and systems · 2020Article
- Evaluating Asthma Mobile Apps to Improve Asthma Self-Management: User Ratings and Sentiment Analysis of Publicly Available Apps.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Automated Misspelling Detection and Correction in Persian Clinical Text.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The process of documentation is one of the most important parts of electronic health records (EHR). It is time-consuming, and up until now, available documentation procedures have not been able to overcome this type of EHR limitations. Thus, entering information into EHR still has remained a challenge. In this study, by applying the trigram language model, we presented a method to predict the next words while typing free texts. It is hypothesized that using this system may save typing time of free text. The words prediction model introduced in this research was trained and tested on the free texts regarding to colonoscopy, transesophageal echocardiogram, and anterior-cervical-decompression. Required time of typing for each of the above-mentioned reports calculated and compared with manual typing of the same words. It is revealed that 33.36% reduction in typing time and 73.53% reduction in keystroke. The designed system reduced the time of typing free text which might be an approach for EHRs improvement in terms of documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.