Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886646›Full record

ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2019

Validity and Reliability of Upper Limb Functional Assessment Using the Microsoft Kinect V2 Sensor.

Laisi Cai, Ye Ma, Shuping Xiong, Yanxin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A novel method forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. [Follow control of upper limb rehabilitation training based on Kinect and NAO robot].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Laisi CaiThe Research Academy of Grand Health, Faculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6563-8986
Ye MaThe Research Academy of Grand Health, Faculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1964-045X
Shuping XiongDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-515X
Yanxin ZhangDepartment of Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-1669
Ningbo University · CNKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the concurrent accuracy and the test-retest reliability of a Kinect V2-based upper limb functional assessment system. APPROACH: Ten healthy males performed a series of upper limb movements, which were measured concurrently with Kinect V2 and the Vicon motion capture system (gold standard). Each participant attended two testing sessions, seven days apart. Four tasks were performed including hand to contralateral shoulder, hand to mouth, combing hair, and hand to back pocket. Upper limb kinematics were calculated using our developed kinematic model and the UWA model for Kinect V2 and Vicon. The interdevice coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) were used to evaluate the validity of the kinematic waveforms. Mean absolute bias and Pearson's MAIN

resultsBoth validity and reliability are found to be task-dependent and plane-dependent. Kinect V2 had good accuracy in measuring shoulder and elbow flexion/extension angular waveforms (CMC > 0.87), moderate accuracy of measuring shoulder adduction/abduction angular waveforms (CMC = 0.69-0.82), and poor accuracy of measuring shoulder internal/external angles (CMC < 0.6). We also found high test-retest reliability of Kinect V2 in most of the upper limb angular waveforms (CMC = 0.75-0.99), angles at the PTA (ICC = 0.65-0.91), and the ROM (ICC = 0.68-0.96). SIGNIFICANCE: Kinect V2 has great potential as a low-cost, easy implemented device for assessing upper limb angular waveforms when performing functional tasks. The system is suitable for assessing relative within-person change in upper limb motions over time, such as disease progression or improvement due to intervention.

Identifiers

PMID30886646
PMCPMC6388351
OpenAlexW2914143977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.