Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886506›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study.

Tao Chen, Liang-Ying Ye, Xing-Yu Feng, Hai-Bo Qiu, Peng Zhang, Yi-Xin Luo, Li-Yi Yuan, Xin-Hua Chen, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Liang-Ying YeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Xing-Yu FengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Hai-Bo QiuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China.
Yi-Xin LuoDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Li-Yi YuanDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Xin-Hua ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yan-Feng HuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China.
Kai-Xiong TaoDepartment of General Surgery, Wuhan Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China.
Jiang YuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Guo-Xin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China. gzliguoxin@163.com.
Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CNWuhan Union Hospital · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed.

aimTo evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for GISTs.

methodsPatients who were diagnosed with GISTs and underwent surgical resection at four hospitals from 1998 to 2015 were identified from a database. Risk of recurrence was stratified by the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram, and the contour maps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to compare the four abovementioned risk stratification systems based on the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsA total of 1303 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.77 ± 13.70 yr; 52.3% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up period was 64.91 ± 35.79 mo. Approximately 67.0% the tumors were located in the stomach, and 59.5% were smaller than 5 cm; 67.3% of the patients had a mitotic count ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (HPFs). Thirty-four tumors ruptured before and during surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size > 5 cm (

conclusionAccording to our data, the AFIP criteria were associated with a larger AUC than the NIH modified criteria, the MSKCC nomogram, and the contour maps, which might indicate that the AFIP criteria have better accuracy to support therapeutic decision-making for patients with GISTs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNomogramsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveArmed Forces Institute of Pathology criteriaContour mapsGastrointestinal stromal tumorsGastrointestinal tumorsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic nomogramModified National Institute of Health criteriaPrognosisRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID30886506
PMCPMC6421238
OpenAlexW2921760335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.