Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886470›Full record

ArticleJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery

Controversies in Hair Transplantation.

Muthuvel Kumaresan, Venkatram Mysore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Patient-Based Ratio Method for Permanent Zone Donor Area Calculation in Hair Transplant.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  3. Maxillofacial Surgery and Hair Transplantation: Ethics with Expertise.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
    Article
  6. Occipital Donor Area Grading and Profile in Indian Population.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muthuvel KumaresanConsultant Dermatologist, Cutis Skin Clinic and Hair Transplant Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Venkatram MysoreConsultant Dermatologist, The Venkat Center for Skin and Plastic Surgery, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hair transplantation being a relatively new field, several aspects raise issues and controversies. The issues refer to both ethics and evidence and how practitioners and the community need to deal with them. This article deals with few of such diverse issues as follicular unit transplantation versus follicular unit excision, safe donor area, platelet-rich plasma, and minimum qualification for performing hair transplantation.

Indexed as

Controversiesfollicular unit excisionfollicular unit transplantationhair transplantation

Identifiers

PMID30886470
PMCPMC6371731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.