Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Genetic analysis of admixture and hybrid patterns of Populus hopeiensis and P. tomentosa.

Dongsheng Wang, Zhaoshan Wang, Xiangyang Kang, Jianguo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic diversity and population dynamic ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dongsheng WangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China.
Zhaoshan WangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China. w@caf.ac.cn.
Xiangyang KangCollege of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100091, China.
Jianguo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China. zhangjg@caf.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization and introgression have resulted in reticulate evolution within the genus Populus. Consequently, the origin and evolutionary history of some hybrids has become blurred. P. hopeiensis and P. tomentosa are endemic to China, and there is still controversy about their origin. We employ phylogeny, Bayesian estimation of admixture, and approximate Bayesian computation to investigate their origin with 10 nuclear DNA and 6 cpDNA regions. The combined evidences firmly support the hypothesis that they are hybrids and dominated by F

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene FlowHybridization, GeneticBayes TheoremChinaDNA, ChloroplastMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPopulusSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Chloroplast

Identifiers

PMID30886279
PMCPMC6423230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.