Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886212›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2019

Genome-wide association analysis reveals KCTD12 and miR-383-binding genes in the background of rumination.

Nora Eszlari, Andras Millinghoffer, Peter Petschner, Xenia Gonda, Daniel Baksa, Attila J Pulay, János M Réthelyi, Gerome Breen, John Francis William Deakin, Peter Antal and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genetic implication of GABAFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sculpting Dendritic Spines during Initiation and Maintenance of Neuropathic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nora EszlariDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. eszlari.nora@pharma.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4913-028X
Andras MillinghofferNAP-2-SE New Antidepressant Target Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter PetschnerDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Xenia GondaNAP-2-SE New Antidepressant Target Research Group, Hungarian Brain Research Program, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Daniel BaksaDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila J PulayDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
János M RéthelyiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gerome BreenSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2053-1792
John Francis William DeakinDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-962X
Peter AntalDepartment of Measurement and Information Systems, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Gyorgy BagdyDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella JuhaszDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-4267
Semmelweis University · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminative response style is a passive and repetitive way of responding to stress, associated with several disorders. Although twin and candidate gene studies have proven the genetic underpinnings of rumination, no genome-wide association study (GWAS) has been conducted yet. We performed a GWAS on ruminative response style and its two subtypes, brooding and reflection, among 1758 European adults recruited in the general population of Budapest, Hungary, and Manchester, United Kingdom. We evaluated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based, gene-based and gene set-based tests, together with inferences on genes regulated by our most significant SNPs. While no genome-wide significant hit emerged at the SNP level, the association of rumination survived correction for multiple testing with KCTD12 at the gene level, and with the set of genes binding miR-383 at the gene set level. SNP-level results were concordant between the Budapest and Manchester subsamples for all three rumination phenotypes. SNP-level results and their links to brain expression levels based on external databases supported the role of KCTD12, SRGAP3, and SETD5 in rumination, CDH12 in brooding, and DPYSL5, MAPRE3, KCNK3, ATXN7L3B, and TPH2 in reflection, among others. The relatively low sample size is a limitation of our study. Results of the first GWAS on rumination identified genes previously implicated in psychiatric disorders underscoring the transdiagnostic nature of rumination, and pointed to the possible role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum in this cognitive process.

Indexed as

ThinkingAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansHungaryMaleMental DisordersMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProteinsUnited KingdomYoung AdultKCTD12 protein, humanMicroRNAsMIRN383 microRNA, humanProteins

Identifiers

PMID30886212
PMCPMC6423133
OpenAlexW2921255730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.