Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886130›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of anesthesiology2019

The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review.

Pablo Kot, Pablo Rodriguez, Manuel Granell, Beatriz Cano, Lucas Rovira, Javier Morales, Ana Broseta, Jose De Andrés

8 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04062045 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Continous Regional Anesthesia Using m. Erector Spinae Catheter After Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorSurgery BitencRan2019 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsNeoplasm of Lung, Thoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedArmsRopivacaine Hcl 0.2% Inj Vil 10Ml, Saline 0.9%
NCT04095325 naunknown statusnot on this map

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spina Plane Block in Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorErzincan UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsIntraoperative Pain ControlArmsUltrasound guided erector spinae block
NCT04337060 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Single-injection Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Sham-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBURHAN DOSTRan2020 to 2021Enrolled52ConditionsProstate Cancer, Anesthesia, Local, Pain, PostoperativeArmsSingle-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block-Sham, Single-injection ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block-Lidocaine/Bupivacaine, Pain follow-up and monitorization
NCT05843344 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Dexmedetomidine and Morphine as Adjuvants to US Guided Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Elective Thoracic Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr Kassiani TheodorakiRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsPain, Postoperative, Pain, Acute, Pain, Chronic, MorphineArmserector spinae plane block with a combination of ropivacaine and morphine, erector spinae plane block with a combination of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine, erector spinae plane block with ropivacaine only
NCT06270654 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Management of Perioperative Pain Using Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Microscopic Lumbar Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsLumbar Spine DiseaseArmsErector spinae plane block, Skin infiltration LA
NCT07396558 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Intermittent Erector Spinae Plane Block Via Subcutaneous Port for Cancer-Related Pain in Patients With Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHanoi Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsCancer Pain, Erector Spinae Plane BlockArmsErector Spinae Plane Block
NCT07469410 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Of Postoperative Analgesia In Landmark Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block And Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPatel Hospital, PakistanRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsPostoperative AnalgesiaArmsLandmark guided Erector Spinae Block, Landmark guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
NCT07514806 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Estimation of Intraoperative Anaesthetic Drug Requirement in General Anaesthesia With or Without Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsSpondylolisthesis, Analgesia, Postoperative, ESPBArmsControl Group: General Anesthesia Without Erector Spinae Plane Block, Intervention Group: General Anesthesia With Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of erector spinae plane block on postoperative recovery quality in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pablo KotDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Pablo RodriguezDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Manuel GranellDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Beatriz CanoDepartment of Hospital Nursing, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Lucas RoviraDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Javier MoralesDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Ana BrosetaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.
Jose De AndrésDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regional anesthesia and pain management have experienced advances in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block is one of the newest techniques to be described. In the past two years, publications referring to ESP block have increased significantly. The objective of this review is to analyze the articles about ESP block that have been published to date. We performed a search in the main databases and identified 368 articles. After a selection of the relevant articles, 125 studies were found eligible and were included in the review. The ESP block is performed by depositing the local anesthetic in the fascial plane, deeper than the erector spinae muscle at the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra. Many cases of its use have been described with satisfactory results in the treatment of both acute pain and chronic pain. The applicability of the technique covers many clinical scenarios. Of the 98 case reports reviewed, 12 and 87 articles, respectively described the technique as a treatment for chronic pain and acute pain. The single-shot was the most frequently used technique. As described in the articles published to date, the technique is easy to perform and has a low rate of complications. However, despite the effectiveness of the technique, further studies are necessary to obtain more evidence of its actions.

Indexed as

Paraspinal MusclesAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalChronic PainHumansNerve BlockPainAnesthetics, LocalErector spinae plane blockESP blockFascial plane blockPainRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID30886130
PMCPMC6547235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 2 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.