Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885774›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Fellowship Training Programs in Radiation Oncology: A Snapshot From 2005 to 2017.

Kaleigh Doke, Osama Mohamad, Trevor J Royce, Jeffrey Meyer, Allen M Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Motivations, Well-Being, and Career Aspirations of Radiation Oncology Resident Physicians in Canada.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaleigh DokeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Osama MohamadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Trevor J RoyceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jeffrey MeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Allen M ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine-Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, California. Electronic address: allen.chen@uci.edu.
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the proliferation of radiation oncology fellowship training programs over the last decade, limited data exist on their actual details. We present findings from a focused survey aiming to evaluate the experiences of fellowship-trained physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A customized 23-item questionnaire was systematically distributed to 127 board-certified or eligible physicians who had completed a radiation oncology fellowship in the United States between 2005 and 2017 and whose contact information was available. The survey queried motivations for pursuing fellowship and aspects of training pertaining to expertise, mentorship, salary, employment outcome, satisfaction, and regret.

resultsA total of 92 subjects responded. Five were still in fellowship and 3 failed to complete the survey in its entirety, leaving 84 (56 male; 28 female) eligible for analysis. Graduates of US residencies comprised 62% of respondents. The desire to build a career in a particular treatment modality was most commonly cited as the primary motivation for pursuing fellowship (58%), followed by the desire to secure an academic faculty position (16%) and the desire to secure a job in a specific geographic location (14%). Subspecialty fellowships were most often done in proton therapy (27%) and brachytherapy (24%). Among the 26 people who completed proton fellowships, only 10 were currently practicing using protons (38%). The majority of fellows (52%) were compensated between $50,000 and $75,000 annually. Seventy-eight (93%) and 72 (86%) physicians were satisfied with fellowship training and their job after fellowship, respectively. Six of the 52 US graduates (12%) and 0 of the 32 international graduates (0%) reported that they would not recommend fellowship to others.

conclusionsThe motivations for pursuing radiation oncology fellowships appear to be complex, and variability exists with respect to multiple aspects of training, including those related to satisfaction and employment outcomes.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMotivationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer MobilityEmploymentFaculty, MedicalFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleHumansInternationalityInternship and ResidencyJob SatisfactionMaleMentorsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30885774
OpenAlexW2922519342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.