Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885364›Full record

ArticleAdvances in cancer research2019

The second genome: Effects of the mitochondrial genome on cancer progression.

Adam D Scheid, Thomas C Beadnell, Danny R Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of Mitochondrial Transfer RNA Mutations in Breast Cancer.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mitohormesis, UPRCancer research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam D ScheidDepartment of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, and The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Thomas C BeadnellDepartment of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, and The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Danny R WelchDepartment of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, and The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, United States. Electronic address: dwelch@kumc.edu.
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · US

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
KISS1: Defining Mechanisms for Antimetastatic TherapyR01CA134981 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WELCH, DANNY R. · 2009 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134981NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of genetics in cancer has been recognized for centuries, but most studies elucidating genetic contributions to cancer have understandably focused on the nuclear genome. Mitochondrial contributions to cancer pathogenesis have been documented for decades, but how mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) influences cancer progression and metastasis remains poorly understood. This lack of understanding stems from difficulty isolating the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes as experimental variables, which is critical for investigating direct mtDNA contributions to disease given extensive crosstalk exists between both genomes. Several in vitro and in vivo models have isolated mtDNA as an independent variable from the nuclear genome. This review compares and contrasts different models, their advantages and disadvantages for studying mtDNA contributions to cancer, focusing on the mitochondrial-nuclear exchange (MNX) mouse model and findings regarding tumor progression, metastasis, and other complex cancer-related phenotypes.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialMutationAnimalsCarcinogenesisDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceNeoplasmsMetabolismMetastasisMitochondrial geneticsMNX micePolymorphismTumor progression

Identifiers

PMID30885364
PMCPMC6921473
OpenAlexW2915815726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.